Pakistan should run ‘Brahmastra’ through Indus water treaty

India has never been in favor of war or enmity, nor has it ever taken up arms before. It is its neighboring countries who expect from India even after their misdeeds that India will forgive and there will be no shortage in the supply of resources. In this sequence, India has made an action plan to make its neighboring country and its enemy side Pakistan fascinated by water, after which Pakistan will continue to yearn for water.

Certainly every country should be aware of its strengths and weaknesses, in this sequence, India this time introspectively scrutinized the main documents and the most important among them turned out to be “Indus Water Treaty”. The Modi government is working on the construction of 10 hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh. Once completed, these projects will jointly provide 6.8 GW of renewable energy to the nation. The project will achieve the Modi government’s goal of generating 500 GW of renewable energy based electricity by the end of 2030.
On the basis of the “Indus Water Treaty”, it is learned that how, being anti-India, it has sufficient provisions to cut off the water supply to Pakistan. Now that it is written in the treaty, it was only natural to come to an action point. So let’s start immediately. Be aware that Pakistan can object to the projects being put in India too, they will undoubtedly say how full of flaws the treaty is. According to Section II, control of the water flowing into three of India’s eastern rivers—the Beas, Ravi and Sutlej rivers—was given to India with an average flow of 33 million acre-feet (Rusn).

Control of the water was given to Pakistan with an average flow of 80 MAF flowing into the Indus, Chenab and Jhelum rivers. India can use only 20 percent of the total water brought in by the Indus river system in a non-consumable way while Pakistan uses the remaining 80 percent. However, the previous Indian governments never used that 20 per cent share and allowed Pakistan to make full use of it. What else can be expected from these governments

Those who were ready to leave that land of Ladakh only because according to the owners of the governments that land was barren, so not using even 20 percent of their share of water is evidence of how the earlier governments used to leave their share unclaimed Be it land or water.